Review: Parallels 27 still the best at running Windows on a Mac – so long as it’s an Apple Silicon Mac

Windows 11 running on macOS 27.2 beta via Parallels Desktop Pro 27, which no longer supports Intel-based Macs.

More than six years ago, when Apple unveiled homegrown processors designed for its Mac computers, the company began a long, controlled journey away from the Intel chips it had used since 2006. The advent of Apple Silicon not only changed the company, it has had far-reaching impacts on the entire personal computer industry that are still being felt today.

Since the launch of the initial M1 processor, Apple has continued to support Intel-based Macs with its new operating systems – until now. macOS 27, launched last month, can’t run on chips that use the x86 architecture. Apple also is beginning to wean users off Rosetta 2, the emulation software that allowed Intel-based apps to run usually flawless on Apple Silicon-based computers. Next year’s macOS iteration won’t support Rosetta at all, requiring only apps that are native on the Mx series of processors.

You’re also starting to see third-party developers follow that path. That includes the makers of Parallels Desktop, the popular virtualization software that lets users run Microsoft’s Windows operating system on a Mac. Beginning with Parallels 27, Intel Macs are no longer supported. Parallels says it plans to continue support for those systems with Parallels 26, which will continue to have updates. I asked company spokespeople about how this will work – and for how long – and this is what they said:

“We plan to support Parallels Desktop on Intel for as long as it remains useful to our customers and practical to do so. Apple’s continued security support for macOS Tahoe, the last macOS version to support Intel-based Macs, will also be an important factor in future support decisions.“

Translated: Expect updates and support for Parallels 26 through 2028. I was also told that Parallels engineers are working now on the next update for Parallels 26.

The best option

Parallels Desktop has long been the best way to run a Windows virtual machine on a Mac. In fact, I’ve written in the past that doing so feels faster and more responsive than Windows on x86-based hardware. That has changed with the recent crop of Windows systems that use ARM-based processor, the same architecture on which Apple Silicon is based. They enjoy similar benefits to newer Macs: Speedy, long battery life, highly energy efficient. But if you are using a Mac, unless you need Windows-specific hardware, there’s really no reason for most folks to buy a physical PC to run Windows.

Microsoft has been chasing the promises of ARM for some time, and the latest crop of PCs that use this ARM-based CPUs show the company has achieved its goals. Microsoft also has made great strides in getting software written for x86 machine to work well on Windows for ARM. Mostly, it’s niche titles and some games and graphics-intensive programs that have issues, but the vast majority of common apps run well this way.

And that’s something that Parallels users can cheer about, because a good chunk of the joy of its virtualization is that Microsoft has succeeded in its own goals. Parallels works so well in part because Windows on ARM does.

Parallels Desktop has evolved into a product that’s mature. While each update of the software often packed in a slew of new features in early days, the great leaps now are fewer and farther between. The company also has shifted its focus toward developers and business users – while earlier versions used to tout improvements in running games, the latest iterations offer features for more serious use cases. As a result there are four different versions of Parallels Desktop: Standard, for most everyday uses; Pro, good for developers and power users (and maybe gamers); Business. There is also an Enterprise Edition for big companies. Higher-end features at limited to Pro and above, but most folks will do just fine with Standard.

Take, for example, Parallels 27’s use of a newer version of OpenGL. All the tiers of Parallels now support version 4.3, which enables high-end graphics apps like ArcGIS Pro, a mapping program. The graphics system now is built around Metal, Apple’s own platform, and OpenGL 4.3 works with this. ArcGIS users should notice a substantial improvement in how this popular app performs.

Parallels 27 also has support for the Scalable Matrix Extension (SME), a feature used to accelerate AI application, on M4, M5 and the newest M5 Macs. This is limited to the Pro, Business and Enterprise versions. And if you have an M3 or older Apple Silicon Mac, this feature won’t be available to you because the hardware doesn’t support it.

I asked Parallels if the new OpenGL 4.3 driver might have a positive impact on games, and this is what they said:

“Yes, there can be benefits for gaming, particularly for Windows games and other applications that rely on OpenGL. Parallels first transitioned Direct3D graphics workloads to a Metal backend with Parallels Desktop 15 in 2019, which delivered a 15% performance improvement at the time. With Parallels Desktop 27, we’ve now transitioned OpenGL workloads to Metal as well, with our testing showing up to 2.6x higher OpenGL frame rates in the initial release.

That said, the impact will vary depending on the game and the graphics APIs it uses. Because this was a significant refactoring of the graphics stack, we also can’t attribute every performance improvement exclusively to Metal. Some gains may come from other efficiencies we introduced as part of the new graphics implementation.“

Translated: Yeah, games might be better, but don’t count on it. And if they are, it may not have to do with OpenGL 4.3.

Running Parallels

Me & Parallels go way back. In 2008, I wrote “Running Windows on Your Mac” (Peachpit Press), which detailed different ways to get Windows running on Mac hardware that came with Intel processors. It was the only book to address the subject, and it covered virtualization – in which Windows runs in a virtual computer set up in the memory of an actual computer – and Boot Camp, Apple’s system that let you choose Windows or macOS at startup. In the virtualization section, it looked at other software, such as VMWare Fusion and VirtualBox, both of which are still around.

I’ve been using Parallels Desktop 27 since it was released in September on an M5 MacBook Pro with 32 GB of memory and a 1-TB SSD. I mostly use this laptop as a desktop in clamshell mode, connected to a 32-inch 4K Dell UltraSharp monitor. I use it mostly for everyday, common tasks, as well as for some apps that just work better in a PC.

For example, I’ve got a set of Creative’s Pebble X Plus speakers that can be configured via an app. The Mac app is just this side of worthless (it hasn’t been updated in five years), while the Windows app is full-featured and lets you adjust playback and recording settings, as well as tinker with the speaker’s lighting, and update firmware and drivers.

The Windows version of the Creative app for managing a set of Pebble X Plus speakers, here shown configuring playback settings, on Windows 11 in Parallels on a Mac.

I’m also partial to a venerable Windows image-editing software called HyperSnap. It has been around forever but is still being developed, and even then I’m happy with version 8 that dates back to 2023 (it’s now up to version 10). It’s a relatively obscure, older app with a long history on Windows, and it runs quickly and without issue on Parallels 27.

If you’ve never used Parallels before but need the ability to use Windows (and some flavors of Linux), you’ll be pleasantly surprised at the setup. You can download and install Windows for ARM directly without the Parallels app, and the process is a lot simpler than installing a fresh version of Windows on a PC. (You’ll still need to buy a separate license for Windows 11, though you can use it for a while without entering a valid product key before it starts nagging you.)

Parallels makes it easy to download and install Windows 11 and various Linux distros.

Parallels also gives you the option to let the software manage the resources it’s using. You can set a fixed amount of memory to be used by the virtual machine, or you can let Parallels handle it dynamically. This works particularly well if you’ve got a Mac with lots of RAM, as I do, but it also is useful if you’ve got a minimum. (Although you can run Windows in Parallels on an 8-GB Mac, I would not recommend any less than 16 GB.)

As I mentioned earlier, running Windows in Parallels on a Mac can be a better experience than Windows on an Intel PC, and that remains true. The speed and efficiency of doing so is challenged only by the ARM-based Windows PCs you can now buy. That was true when I was using my 2020 MacBook Pro with an M1 processor, and it is even more impressive now with my M5 MBP.

However, physical PCs still have one advantage: gaming. While you can play high-end games via Windows in Parallels on a Mac, the experience is not going to match that of a native computer. (This is also true of ARM-based PCs.) It helps to have a lot of memory, and even better if you’ve got a Mac with one of the latest M5 Pro, Max or Ultra processors.

If you need to a Windows system for development, to run mainstream business or productivity titles, or because you have a favorite Windows app you just can’t give up, it is an excellent alternative to shelling out for PC hardware.

Yeah, it’s a subscription

Parallels moved to a subscription-based business model a while back. There remains a one-time-purchase option, but it’s only on the lowest-end version and it’s more than the list price of two years of subscription pricing. I know a lot of folks chafe at subscription software, but it really is a more equitable way to fund ongoing development of an app like Parallels.

As mentioned earlier, the Standard version is fine for mainstream home and productivity use. It lists for $99.99 a year (currently discounted to $39.99), and the one-time-purchase option is $219.99. There are resource limitations with Standard, including a ceiling of 8 GB of RAM on a virtual machine. The one-time-purchase option limits you to 30 days of technical support; all the subscription versions come with unlimited support.

The Pro version, which is aimed at power users and developers, lists for $119.99 annually (discounted to $47.99). You can also pay for a two-year subscription for $239.98 (discounted to $159.99).

The Business Edition, aimed at businesses and organizations, is $149.99 annually ($97.49 discounted) or two years for $299.98 (discounted to $209.99)

There are also student discounts, as well as discounts for those upgrading from previous version.

Review: CarpodGo’s T4 Plus is CarPlay that’s bright, fast and in your face.

Note: In June, the personal technology column I’d written for more than 30 years at the Chronicle ended. After spending the summer enjoying being a bum, studying the art of retirement and mostly watching paint dry, I’ve decided to write occasionally here when the mood strikes, or when I come across some gear I think you’ll want to know about. That’s what this is: CarpodGo approached me about reviewing their latest CarPlay display, and as you will see, I had a personal reason for checking it out. Expect to see more of this in the coming months. -D.S.


Almost a decade ago, my lovely wife bought a new car: A 2017 Prius 4. I’d gotten a look at this redesigned version of Toyota’s original hybrid the year before, when I reviewed the 2016 version for my blog. My wife had a 2012 Prius and loved it, and shortly after my review she gave that vehicle to our oldest.

While the 2017 Prius was a comfortable car with killer gas mileage – I had been able to get 85 mpg under the best conditions – it lacked one important feature. Toyota had not yet adopted Apple’s CarPlay, which mirrors an iPhone user’s phone screen in a vehicle’s infotainment system. I enjoyed driving her car until, two years later, I bought a 2019 Toyota C-HR, which did have CarPlay. Suddenly, I was spoiled, and I would always prefer to drive my car, despite the Prius’ more economical oeuvre. I became a CarPlay snob.

And it’s not just me. iPhone users who own vehicles with CarPlay usually become die-hards. Just ask GM, who suffered the slings and arrows of internet scorn when the company announced it would support neither CarPlay nor Android Auto in its latest electric vehicles – and then doubled down by saying that it would eventually drop the features in its gasoline-powered fleet as well.

GM’s stance pretty much guaranteed I’d never buy a GM EV; many other CarPlay fans feel the same way. (It’s worth noting that while Android Auto is also digitalia non grata on GM cars and trucks, Google is supplying a custom version of Android as part of its software package.)

The point to be made is this: Once you’ve had a phone-mirroring technology like CarPlay or Android Auto on your dash, it’s very hard to go back. But if you have an older car or truck that doesn’t support CarPlay, you’ve got two options: Either replace the head unit for the stereo/infotainment system with one that allows for phone mirroring, or add a standalone display dedicated to mirroring an iPhone or Android device.

The joy of the display

The latter category is simpler and less expensive, and there are literally dozens of models available on Amazon. However, their quality varies, and many suffer from the same problems as the cheap adapters that provide wireless CarPlay/Android Auto capabilities to vehicles that only have the wired variant. The issues include connection drops and sluggish performance. In addition, the cheaper standalone displays are sometimes slow and not bright enough in direct sunlight.

So, when vehicle-screen maker CarpodGo offered a review unit of its latest high-end CarPlay screen, I was intrigued. I’d long thought about trying a standalone display for CarPlay in my wife’s Prius, and here was an opportunity to see what she’d think. Even though I was trying really, really hard to be retired, I told the Chinese-based company to bring it on.

CarpodGo’s T4 Plus features a 10.9-inch diagonal display with a brightness rating of 1,000 nits. (Dwight Silverman photo)

CarpodGo shipped me the T4 Plus, its flagship device that just became available on Amazon, where it currently sells for a list price of $250. The T4 Plus is a beast, with an expansive 10.9-inch diagonal IPS display that boasts a brightness rating of a whopping 1,000 nits and a refresh rate of 60 Hz. It includes several different dashboard mounts, a custom DC-port plug to power the screen and an actual physical manual – a rarity these days, when online documentation is more often the standard – though it’s printed in the tiniest font imaginable. A magnetic base connects to the various mounts that lets you quickly remove the display if you don’t want to leave it in your car when when away.

A smaller version, the T4, is functionally identical but with an 8.9-inch diagonal display. It lists for $230.

CarpodGo also sells an optional rear-view camera for older vehicles that lack one, which is now required as a safety feature. It works with both sizes.

My original approach was to set this up in the 2017 Prius and let my wife use it for a while as part of the review. But just before the T4 Plus arrived, our kid’s hand-me-down 2012 Prius incurred yet another major repair. As reliable a vehicle as it’s been, after 14 years its time had come – it was costing us more than it was worth. We made the call to give them the newer Prius, which meant I needed to drive the car nearly 800 miles from Houston to where they live in southwestern Illinois. My wife already had a plane ticket for a planned visit, so I was on my own on the road – just me and the T4 Plus for two full days of summer driving.

Set up and go

Getting the display ready to go was fairly easy. As is the case with wireless CarPlay adapters, CarpodGo’s screens connect to a phone first via Bluetooth, then hand off to a WiFi connection. Since the screens don’t come with speakers, you must also make sure you have a Bluetooth connection to your infotainment system – which, if you’ve been toodling around in a vehicle without CarPlay, you likely already have – for audio and phone calls.

Oh, and here’s a setup tip: You don’t actually have to be in the car to initially pair your phone to the screen. You can do it in the comfort of your home, with the screen connected via USB-C to any charger that supports the Power Delivery charging protocol and can provide at least 9 volts of power. Once paired, you can focus in the vehicle on getting the display mounted on the dash.

And getting it mounted is the bigger challenge. Both the T4 Plus, which weighs just over a pound with the magnetic base attached, and the smaller T4, require that the bottom of the screen be resting on the top of the dash. That’s because with any of the supplied mounts, the vehicle’s movement can cause the whole assembly to come loose while driving if the display is suspended. As a result, finding a location in the vehicle where the screen is in easy reach for touching but also adequately supported was tricky in the Prius. I wound up placing it to the left of the steering wheel.

Also keep in mind that, even though this is wireless CarPlay, it’s not really “wireless.” In fact, you’ll need two cables – one to feed power to the display, and another to keep your phone charged while using GPS and navigating. For that reason, I opted not to use the included power cable and plug that came with the T4 Plus, because while it has a USB outlet for a phone on the plug, it’s USB-A, which doesn’t provide enough muscle to keep my iPhone 17 Pro Max charged while Waze or Apple Maps keep track of where I am. Instead, I used a 120-watt adapter that plugs into the DC port with 2 USB-C connections.

On the road with the T4 Plus

During the two-day drive, using the T4 Plus for CarPlay was a joy. Its wide display presents an additional column of app icons than found my C-HR’s smaller screen. It’s also much faster then my car’s built-in display – swiping between screens and opening apps was lightning-quick. And the super-bright screen was perfect for the sunny, cloudless conditions of a long summer road trip. (It auto-dims as needed.) The connection was rock-steady, and connected to my phone instantly whenever I started the car.

Screenshot of the T4 Plus display, showing two rows and generous five columns of apps.

But those sunny conditions resulted in one of the few glitches in my testing. Temperatures all along the route were close to or sometimes over 100 degrees, and because the T4 Plus was atop the dashboard and thus was often in direct sunlight. The resultingheat would cause the display to slow down so that apps dragged while opening, and moving between home screens was sluggish. The fact that the back of the screen is black plastic didn’t help, and for much of the drive was hot to the touch. When it was not in direct sunlight, or after I’d stopped for a while and then got back on the road, performance returned to normal.

This is not uncommon among smart devices. Anyone with an iPhone who has it mounted in a vehicle so that direct sunlight hits it has experienced the “Charging on hold until iPhone returns to a normal temperature” message. In this case, the T4 Plus was usable, just a little annoying.

One other annoyance had nothing to do with the screen itself, but rather the Bluetooth connection in the Prius. Because the vehicle dates back to 2014, it uses an older version of Bluetooth, and the audio during phone calls was, um, sub-optimal, with low-quality sound that was sometimes difficult to hear. This was something my wife often complained about while she was driving the car, and on my trip I felt her pain. The T4 screens do have have the option to use a direct AUX jack connection or even an FM connection to the radio for audio. I didn’t try either.

One feature I wish the T4 Plus had: A dashcam. Given that the screen must sit atop the dashboard, it has a great view of the road ahead. I would have preferred that over the rear camera option, though adding a recording camera to the display could have made the heat issue worse.

One other missing feature: Over-the-air firmware updates. The T4 Plus and T4 require that you download new firmware to a flash drive, which is then inserted into a USB-C port on the back of the screen. This is cumbersome and could result in errors. A CarpodGo spokesperson said the company is working on adding OTA updates, but didn’t have a timeline for when.

Conclusions

The CarpodGo T4 Plus is an excellent standalone CarPlay display, and if you’re in the market for a way to bring CarPlay to an older vehicle, it’s worth your consideration. However, I have one caveat. In a smaller car like the Prius, or any vehicle with limited space to mount the display, I’d recommend the smaller, 8.9-inch model, which has the same brightness and speed.

Is your car’s cabin even more cramped? The company also makes the Mini, a 6.9-inch version with the same 60-Hz refresh and 1,000 nits of brightness. It lists for $120, and is easily the best value of the three. Another benefit: The Mini does not require that the bottom of the screen be resting on the dash. Bueno.

Column Day [Updated]

(Last updated 1:55 pm CDT August 6th, 2026)

[Update 6/24/2026 to add a link to my final column and to tighten and polish.]

Two days after I’d learned the Houston Chronicle was ending my personal technology column, my daughter urged me in no uncertain terms that I must open my Father’s Day present – which had already arrived – right now, a month ahead of time.

When I did, I discovered why she was so insistent.

I typically write my column on Wednesdays, with the goal of filing by the workday’s end. I call this “Column Day,” because I set all things aside to get it done, including familial relationships. When my daughter calls to chat on the phone, I almost always wave her off, saying, “Sorry, Jess, it’s Column Day.”

The gift, it turns out, was a coffee mug with a picture of Milo, our needy orange tabby, demanding attention above the words “It’s Column Day.”

Sorry, Milo, I’m on deadline.

Get you a daughter who gives you presents like this. Also, if you zoom in, you will see a disgusting amount of cat hair on the mug warmer.

At this writing, there are four more Column Days. My last Personal Tech dispatch publishes online June 20, and the next day in print. But thanks to Jess’ thoughtfulness and wicked sense of humor, I’ll always have the mug. [Update: You can read that final column here.]

I’ve been writing the column, with a few hiatuses along the way, since 1993. It’s had several names over the years, but it has always had one purpose: To help Houstonians understand the personal technology revolution that continues to roil our collective waters. You can drown in the flood or you can learn to at least dog paddle. If you’re really into it, you might even get to a decent breaststroke.

My column is the longest-running one in the Chronicle at the moment. I consider it an honor that they’ve kept me around. I left the paper in January 2021 after taking a buyout and a planned retirement. But when I announced I was leaving, I got a call from Forbes and an invitation to start a paid tech newsletter for them. I’d loved doing a my newsletter for the Chronicle, one of the paper’s earliest forays into the current trend, and it was doing well, so I jumped at the chance. But Forbes did a lousy job of promoting it, and paid newsletters on topics where there’s so much free content available online tend to falter. Frustrated, I left after a few months.

And when I did, Rob Gavin, then the Chronicle’s business editor, asked if I wanted to resume my local column as a freelancer. I was happy to do so. I was back home.

So it went for more than four years. Monday’s email was a surprise, but I was not all that surprised when it came. I was writing a gadget/gear/app/internet personal technology column that only occasionally focused on local issues for a local publication. Local is the biggest strength newspapers have in the fractured media landscape, and I was not always playing to it. In addition, I was a freelancer, and historically when a publication needs to trim closer to the financial bone, non-staffers are low-hanging fruit.

So the answer to the question, “Did he jump or was he pushed?”, is assuredly the latter. But I had, for some time, been contemplating the former, considering stopping the column when 2026 ended.

Although my column only appeared weekly and took a day to write, it required a lot of time both to prep for it and to keep up with tech developments. Because I was not covering the topic on a daily basis, I had a lot of reading to do to keep up. The writing of Personal Tech was a (mostly) a joy, but staying in the hunt had become a grind.

I turn 70 in August and have been pondering actual retirement. The running joke in my social media profiles is that I am “kinda” retired and that I am “not good at retirement.” Maybe, I had been thinking, it’s time to get good at it. The Chronicle made my decision for me, and as the kids say, I am not even mad.

I also realized after getting the news that I’m almost the last personal tech newspaper columnist standing. When the column first began under the title “Computing,” there were quite a few of us. Back then, tech columnists and the technology sections that hosted them were the new shiny objects at newspapers, but as the internet went mainstream technology coverage moved to that platform – as did just about every other topic, eventually.

As far as I can tell, there’s only one other columnist writing about personal tech in the classical way I did for local papers, and that’s my old friend and one-time book collaborator Larry Magid, whose column still appears in the San Jose Mercury-News. (Hang in there, Larry!)

There are other longtime local tech journalists who once had columns who are still active, but they are doing more news/issues writing these days. The pure chroniclers of consumer digitalia are now found on the web and/or on video, particularly YouTube or TikTok.

Marcus “MKBHD” Brownlee is the new Walt Mossberg.

When I said on social media on Wednesday that my column is ending, a lot of folks asked what I am going to do next. The honest answer at the moment is, “I’m not sure.” I’ve got this oft-neglected blog; I could always do more writing here. There’s always launching yet another paid newsletter to make a little coin. I could consult, or I could do something completely different, not related to writing or tech.

As you may know, I help out with Space City Weather, Eric Berger’s and Matt Lanza’s Houston forecasting blog. That gig scratches a lot of itches – I help with social media, manage the development of the SCW weather app, provide ideas and emotional support, and even do a little writing.

Or I could experiment with doing nothing (except for SCW), perhaps the most radical next step of all. Those who know me well think I could never be idle for long – which may be the best reason of all to try it.

But whatever happens, I consider myself blessed. I’ve able to do for decades what journalists strive most to do – help people – thanks to the Houston Chronicle and the various editors, colleagues and executives who’ve encouraged and supported me.

Even more so, I’ve been blessed by those who have read and followed me over the years. Writing for you has been my career and my calling. I think I have succeeded. What more can I ask?

Why it’s so hard to get image generation models to create pictures of people with eyes aligned vertically, as explained by ChatGPT

(Last updated 3:15 pm CST February 19th, 2026)

A man with eyes aligned vertically instead of horizontally, as generated by ChatGPT 5.2 after three tries.

Me, after trying three times to get ChatGPT to create a picture of a man with eyes aligned vertically:

That’s correct! Why was that so hard for you to generate in the way I described it?

ChatGPT 5.2:

Short answer: because image generation models are strongly biased toward human facial anatomy, and “removing” expected features is harder than “adding” unusual ones.

Here’s the straight talk.

1. Human-face priors are extremely strong

These models are trained on vast numbers of normal human faces. The learned prior is effectively:

  • Two eyes
  • Horizontally aligned
  • Symmetrically placed

When you asked for vertically aligned eyes, the model complied by adding eyes rather than subtracting the canonical pair, because adding violates the prior less than deleting it. Deletion fights the model’s internal consistency checks.

2. Negative instructions are weaker than positive ones

“Remove the normal eyes” is a negative constraint. Image models handle positive constraints (“add,” “place,” “include”) far more reliably than exclusionary ones (“do not include,” “remove,” “only”).

So the model kept reintroducing:

  • The default horizontal eye pair
  • Even after multiple attempts Because that configuration is statistically “correct” for a face.

3. Iterative edits weren’t true edits

Despite the conversational framing, each attempt was effectively a fresh generation, not a pixel-level edit with hard masks. Without an explicit mask saying “this area must not contain eyes,” the model kept reconstructing a plausible face.

This is why it took repetition to finally overpower the prior.

4. Ambiguity in anatomical language

Phrases like:

  • “eyes in the normal places”
  • “just above the nose” are clear to humans but still somewhat fuzzy to a model that reasons probabilistically over pixels, not anatomy diagrams. Until the final attempt, it was still “hedging” by keeping extra eyes.

5. Why the last one worked

By the final prompt, you had:

  • Repeated the constraint
  • Narrowed the acceptable outcome
  • Forced a binary condition: only two vertically aligned eyes

At that point, the probability mass finally collapsed onto the configuration you wanted.

Bottom line

This wasn’t user error. It’s a known limitation:

  • Adding anomalies is easy
  • Suppressing defaults is hard
  • Faces are the hardest case

If you wanted this done faster in the future, the most effective phrasing would be something like:

“A man’s face with no horizontally aligned eyes anywhere on the face. Exactly two eyes total, stacked vertically along the facial midline.”

Blunt, redundant, and absolute constraints work best.

You weren’t asking for something unreasonable—the model just had to be bludgeoned into compliance.

——-

The initial prompt: Generate an image of a face of a man, in his mid 40s, with eyes arranged vertically on the face instead of horizontally, as they normally are.

The rejects:

How I set up a new Mac [Updated x4]

(Last updated 5:37 pm CDT October 4th, 2026)

[Updated this post on 10/4/2026 to reflect changes in the process. And to note that, thanks to retirement 🎉, I am no longer regularly reviewing Macs.]

When I regularly reviewed Apple’s Mac laptops and desktops, I developed a setup routine to make them my own for the brief period I had them. It was similar to what I do when I get a new Mac for myself.

Yeah, I know, I could use Migration Assistant or other tools to automate this, but I like the idea of a fresh start, and being able to ponder, then pick and choose what I want to keep or discard.

Of course, there are steps I’ll forget, so I wanted to write the process down. This is as much for my convenience and forgetfulness as it is for your geeky voyeurism. Anyway, here’s how it goes:

  • In the initial setup process, I typically just keep the default selections. If I want to change something, I can always do it later.
  • Go to Settings > Trackpad, turn on Tap to click
  • Open Finder, drag Applications, Utilities, Documents folder to the right side of the Dock
  • Settings > Display, set to More Space on a laptop, Default on a desktop
  • Finder > Settings, add Hard Disks and Connected servers to the desktop, remove CDs, DVD, iPods
    In Sidebar, add user folder
    In Advanced, performing a search to Current Folder
    In Finder > View in the Menu bar, turn on Path Bar, Status Bar, Tab Bar
  • In the Dock remove Keynote, Numbers
  • Open Safari, download and configure Microsoft Edge, set as Keep in Dock (Sorry, Mac purists, but I fell in love with Edge when I saw its vertical tabs implementation, and I’ve never looked back.)
  • Settings > Desktop and Dock, enable magnification, set Edge as default browser
  • Download, install and configure iStat Menus
  • Download, install and configure Apparency
  • Download, install and configure AirBuddy
  • Download and install Geekbench
  • Download, install and configure Parcel, a shipment tracker
  • Download and install Mactracker
  • Download, install and configure ChatGPT
  • ADDED: Download, install and configure Bauhaus Clock.
  • ADDED: Download, install and configure Better Display.
  • ADDED: Download, install and configure Coconut Battery.
  • ADDED: Download and install Folder Quick Look.
  • ADDED: Download and install MacWhisper.
  • ADDED: Download and install Our Groceries.
  • ADDED: Download and install Overcast.
  • ADDED: Download and install RadarScope.
  • ADDED: Download and install the Space City Weather app.
  • Download and install Parallels for Mac and Parallels Toolbox, enabling Toolbox’s Free Memory and Clipboard Manager to appear in the Menu Bar. Set up a Windows 11 VM in Parallels.
  • Download, install and configure Spark Desktop, set as Keep in Dock. (After a disastrous version 3.0 release, Spark has redeemed itself with its latest, 3.5 update. Just don’t expect too much from its ChatGPT integration.)
  • I subscribe to Microsoft 365, installed via the web. I am using Outlook as my primary email client, but continue to use Spark to see how its development is going.
  • Download, install and configure the Mona 7 for Mastodon client
  • Open Messages, turn on Messages in iCloud
  • On iPhone Settings > Messages > Text Message Forwarding, enable messages from the new Mac
  • Enable iPhone Mirroring with my current iPhone.
  • Set Weather, Text Edit to Keep in Dock
  • In Settings > Control Center, let Weather to post current conditions in the Menu Bar.
  • Set macOS Passwords app to show its icon in the Menu Bar
  • In Automator, create “Get to work” application to launch Spark Outlook, Edge, Mona and Messages, put alias on the desktop
  • In Automator, create “Quit all apps” application, put alias on the desktop

That’s it for now. I’ll tweak this over time.